Rangers (In Administration) and Ticketus – Back in Court on Wednesday 25th April

Rangers Football Club PLC (In Administration) will be back in the Court of Session on Wednesday 25th April before Lord Hodge.


The Scottish Courts website has the following entry for Wednesday. (Scroll about 2/3 of the way down the Scottish courts page to see it in situ.)


LORD HODGE – H. Fraser, Clerk

Wednesday 25th April

Starred Motion

Between 10.00am and 11.00am


1 P221/12 Pet: Rangers Football Club Plc for an Administration Order


Biggart Baillie LLP Burness LLP  

Biggart Baillie act for the administrators, Duff & Phelps, whilst Burness represent the various companies who together make up Ticketus.

The court rolls do not tell us whose application is before the court, but it is likely to be one by D&P. Burness are involved because the hearing relates to its client.

It might only, of course, be a hearing to decide who pays for last months court proceedings. In any event, it will not be another attempt by D&P to have Ticketus and its deal torn up with court approval, or if it is, then Wednesday’s calling will be for the purposes of scheduling a full hearing at a later date.

One hour is rather long, even for the Court of Session, to simply fix a new date.

When I first saw this on the court lists, I wondered if it could relate to the “virtual” creditors’ meeting which concluded yesterday.

Under the Insolvency Rules, when the initial creditors’ meeting has taken place, the administrators must, in terms of Rule 53, report its outcome to the court.

In addition, as shown below, if the creditors reject the administrators’ proposals, that has to go back before the court too.

Rule 55 states:-

(1) This paragraph applies where an administrator reports to the court that—

(a) an initial creditors’ meeting has failed to approve the administrator’s proposals presented to it….

(2)The court may—

(a) provide that the appointment of an administrator shall cease to have effect from a specified time;

(b) adjourn the hearing conditionally or unconditionally;

(c) make an interim order;

(d) make an order on a petition for winding up suspended by virtue of paragraph 40(1) (b);

(e) make any other order (including an order making consequential provision) that the court thinks appropriate.

As Wednesday’s hearing was fixed prior to the creditors’ meeting, and therefore D&P would not know what the judge would be considering, I do not think that the calling of the case next week is to do with the up to date position of the administration.

However, Lord Hodge is perfectly entitled to ask counsel for D&P what the position is.

It might well be worthwhile for any reporter wanting a scoop to pop down to the Court of Session on Wednesday morning for 10 am! Bearing in mind the calls by Bill Miller for transparency, I think it is fair to say that the one place where the Rangers situation has been presented to the public without being filtered through the lens of public relations and spin was in the court for the previous D&P v Ticketus hearing.

In dealing with the media, and attempting to “manage expectations” PR tools are essential, and there is nothing wrong with them being used. However, PR and spin don’t work in court.

Subject to whatever happens on Monday in connection with Mr Miller’s bid, I am sure Lord Hodge on Wednesday will be very interested in the process of the administration, and even if he does not look for that information, counsel for Ticketus might well do so.


Still to come on this channel – I analyse the legal innovations proposed by Mr Miller, and I take a close look at D&P’s resolutions, and what the court might order D&P to do, depending on the creditors’ vote.





Filed under Administration, Courts, Football, Rangers

12 responses to “Rangers (In Administration) and Ticketus – Back in Court on Wednesday 25th April


    Will they last till Wednesday?

    Isn’t it about time they got their just desserts-liquidation and oblivion-so that we can get ours-jelly and ice cream?

  2. Deekbhoy

    When is/was the creditors vote?i

  3. John Pollock

    Great stuff Paul. Tell me this, are the public allowed into the Court of session, and could the judge order them to liquidate on Wednesday?

  4. Joseph

    On the ball again Paul. ”It might well be worthwhile for any reporter wanting a scoop to pop down to the Court of Session…” I had a chuckle at this! I imaged the great Editor in the Sky (Paul) looking down on his journalist troops and instructing them to attend on Wednesday. I wonder how many news editors in Scotland are also on the ball? If not (and I suspect not) then they can always dip into this blog for their scoops! This Gers saga just gets worse, looking for a sneaky way out, a last-minute goal to get them off the spiral of corruption on a massive scale.

  5. john clarke

    Wild horses could not keep me away from Court 11 on Wednesday. Well spotted, m’lud!

  6. Brian Jeffrey

    Who gets the £11.2m from Bill Miller’s proposal? Does that go to Caig Whyte for his shares or to D&P to distribute amongst creditors? I suspect the first but surely that can’t be right. He gets £11.2m for a £1 stake and all the debt transfers to the new owners! Tell me I am wrong.

  7. Timabhouy

    Liquidate its the humane thing to do

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s